
Big cities and bright lights does not make for being hip. This seems contradictory to Leland's earlier view of hip being about knowledge and abducting the views of others.
Yes, living in the big cities, knowing the 'street smarts' to get by, including, but not limited to, city fashion, the right places to go and to stay away from, things to do and see, or what type of city transportation you should stay away from, may intertwine with both of his views.
However, does this not also apply in the rural areas? They have a special knowledge of where they come from. Are they not hip because they are not in the spotlight?
Try telling this to the farmer that grows the organic foods that are hip to eat right now. Or the marijuana grower that produces the hemp that makes the clothes that are trendy, (among other things that this is used for that keeps the city folk happy). Or try telling Peek A Boo Street, whom lived in one of the smallest towns in Idaho, that her gold medal isn't hip.
These people do not live in the bright lights of the cities. But yet, they can survive if they did. Few city people however, could survive the country. Who is hip know?
Are small towns and rural people really not considered hip or possibly the reason for being hip?
It seems to me, that maybe it's the city and urbanization, that is chasing the 'hipness' of rural life and knowledge, rather than the other way around.



